Mini Investigation - How Child Directed Speech Affects The Child's Response
Introduction
I have chosen to explore child directed
speech and how this affects the child's responses. I have analysed data
produced by a two year old girl and her Grandmother when speaking at home,
provided in video format; 'All The Things'. My hypothesis centres around Skinner’s
theory of 'Operant Conditioning' considering 'positive reinforcement' to have
an positive affect on a child's behaviour.
Data
Analysis
The data is unreliable, we know very
little context beyond the participants relationship, for example, we do not
know if they have a close relationship (allowing the child to explore language
freely) or if the Grandmother has an awareness of her language (knowledge of
CLA) and suits her language accordingly. We also have the observer’s paradox,
due to the recording which the Grandmother is aware of throughout and Evie shows
some awareness of.
Considering operant conditioning,
Evie's behaviour will already have been affected by other adults, especially
her parents. We do not know the exact effect of the Grandmother's language and
reinforcement on her behaviour, especially if the Grandmother's reinforcement
conflicts with other adults (parents).
Beyond this, we have no comparable
data; this could be highly irregular language use for all we know.
Transcript
Analysis
Here is a section of ‘All The Things’
transcript, in which there are examples of positive reinforcement;
E (inaudible) …my
smile
G hahaha now who else
might go in the shower? oh that’s a lovely face Evie (.) are you taking a
picture haha of you smiling?
E ha yes
G yeah that’s good
E picture [pɪʧɘ]
of me
G yeah it is a picture
of you (.) hahaha that’s a lovely smile (.) right now what else shall we do?
E that nice
G that’s lovely
E (inaudible)
…smile
G it is nice smiling (.)
hahaha
E I smile
G you are sm-
E (inaudible)
G ah you’re smiling a
nice smile (.) now who else shall we get from this house?
Evie highlights ‘my smile’ searching for a positive reaction from her Grandma, looking for praise, Grandma recognises this cue and proceeds so; ‘hahaha’ and continues to ask her question, Evie continues to smile though and Grandma understands that this requires a more obvious reaction and praises Evie. Grandma’s laughter and positive language; ‘lovely smiles, lovely, nice smiling’ is positive reinforcement and Evie desires more so she continues to repeat the behaviour; she continues to smile, hoping to gain that same praise from Grandma. This is then repeated a further five times. This is a clear example of Erikson’s ‘operant conditioning’ theory.
Conclusion
This evidence supports the hypothesis,
leading to the conclusion that positive reinforcement leads to the repetition
of positive behaviour. This also fits with other theories; Freud believed that
we’re made up of three parts, the id (ego centric) concerned with its own
needs, the ego which understands how to please the id and the super ego that
appreciates society’s rules when deciding how to please the id. In this case we
see the ego at play, understanding that certain behaviours elicit certain
responses, including which behaviours create a response that pleases the id’s
need to feel loved. Erik Erikson has theories of development, one named
‘autonomy vs doubt’ which children are said to experience between eighteen
months and three years of age. The idea that a child begins to understand their
own power to make decisions links with Skinner’s idea in that the children are
beginning to understand that different decisions provide different outcomes. At
this stage they should be most sensitive to ‘operant conditioning’.
Evaluation
The data pool was limited meaning the
results are also limited but general experience with children does support Skinner’s
theory. We give praise, generally, to encourage good behaviour and similarly
condemn poor behaviour in hope of it not being repeated (negative
reinforcement).
Some good conceptualisation. Check affect/effect. Did you mean Skinner in the analysis or does Erikson also study operant conditioning. The focus is skewed towards behaviour and away from language here - the positive reinforcement doesn't encourage Evie's linguistic development so much as her social development, so choose a more clearly language-based example for future analyses. Also look to use multiple examples and contrast them - I did ask you to consider one of the other Evie videos too and this would allow you to examine the effect of varying contexts on two or more comparable examples. Can you also try looking at the relevance of more than one theory to an example, challenging the theory's validity?
ReplyDelete